Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen: Advocating Stance on Anti-LGBTQ Bill and Tax Cuts in State of the State Address

LINCOLN, Neb. -- Governor Jim Pillen addressed Nebraska lawmakers in his second state of the state speech, covering a spectrum of topics from commendations for the state's response to recent winter storms to voicing support for a controversial bill that seeks to regulate transgender student involvement in high school sports and limit access to bathrooms and locker rooms. However, it was Pillen's ambitious plan to cut local government property taxes and potentially increase the state's 5.5% sales tax that sparked widespread criticism across the political spectrum.

At the heart of Pillen's proposal is a bold initiative to reduce property taxes by 40%, amounting to a staggering $2 billion cut from the $5 billion collected statewide in 2022. "First and foremost, the most important economic issue we face is out-of-control property taxes," emphasized Pillen. Property tax grievances are nothing new for Nebraska's homeowners and businesses, ranking seventh in the nation for the highest property tax rate in 2021, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

While historically, state officials have argued that property tax matters were the responsibility of county and city governments, Pillen's proposal seeks to address the escalating tax burden on homeowners. The surge in housing prices over recent years has resulted in soaring property tax bills, particularly affecting residents on fixed incomes, such as the elderly, who, despite having paid off their mortgages, find it challenging to manage the ever-increasing tax obligations.

Fixed-income Nebraskans who have lived, worked, and raised families here now face the prospect of being forced out of their homes," Pillen acknowledged. Achieving the targeted 40% reduction poses a considerable challenge, but Pillen outlined several measures, including a bill enforcing a stringent spending cap on local governments, subject to approval through popular vote. Additionally, he endorsed proposals to close tax loopholes for special interests, redirect $274 million from state agency cash funds to alleviate property taxes, and potentially raise cigarette taxes by up to $2 per pack.

It's not the job of government to hoard cash," declared Pillen. "We must give it back to the people." The governor's proposals signal a determined effort to provide relief to Nebraska residents grappling with the weight of property taxes, setting the stage for debates and discussions on the path forward in the state legislature.

In a notable omission from his address, Governor Pillen refrained from mentioning a crucial aspect of his strategy to alleviate property taxes: a potential increase in the state sales tax. In a proposal put forth earlier this month, Pillen suggested elevating the sales tax by 2 percentage points, aiming for a total of 7.5%—a move that, if implemented, would make it the highest in the nation.

Under this plan, cities with an existing local sales tax could see an additional charge of nearly 10 cents for every dollar spent on various goods and services, excluding groceries, which remain untaxed in Nebraska. Surprisingly, no lawmaker in Nebraska's unique one-chamber legislature, composed of 49 members, stepped forward to propose such a bill.

Omaha Sen. Lou Ann Linehan, however, took the initiative by suggesting a potential 1-cent increase in sales tax to counterbalance the proposed 40% reduction in property taxes. This proposal, however, has sparked protests from both liberals and conservatives alike. The Nebraska Democratic Party criticized such tax adjustments as a "massive shift in taxes on the backs of working and middle-class families." Conversely, the conservative Tax Foundation argued that increased cigarette and sales taxes could negatively impact Nebraska businesses, potentially driving consumers to neighboring states with lower sales tax rates.

Manish Bhatt, an analyst with the Tax Foundation, advocated for a focus on revenue limits as a means of providing property tax relief. He suggested that if lawmakers sought to broaden the sales tax base, they should do so without increasing the rate. When questioned about the possibility of achieving a 40% reduction in property taxes without a sales tax increase, Pillen acknowledged that his plan would necessitate an "extraordinary tax shift." However, he stopped short of outright endorsing a sales tax hike, stating, "I'm supportive of any and all options that will get us to that 40%." The governor's stance on this crucial aspect leaves room for continued debate and exploration of alternative avenues for achieving the desired reduction in property taxes.

In conclusion, Governor Pillen's ambitious proposal to alleviate property taxes in Nebraska by potentially increasing the state sales tax has stirred a significant debate. While his address emphasized the need for a 40% reduction in property taxes, the governor's plan to achieve this through a sales tax hike has generated both support and opposition.

The omission of this key detail from Pillen's state of the state address underscores the complexity and sensitivity surrounding tax reforms. Critics argue that an increase in sales tax, especially one that could make Nebraska's rate the highest in the nation, might disproportionately affect working and middle-class families. Conversely, supporters, including the governor himself, believe in exploring all options to achieve the targeted reduction, even if it involves what Pillen described as an "extraordinary tax shift.

The ongoing discussions in Nebraska's legislature, particularly around the potential impacts on businesses and consumers, reflect the intricate balancing act required in tax policy decisions. As the state navigates the path towards property tax relief, the governor's openness to various options suggests that the debate will continue to unfold, with stakeholders weighing the potential benefits and drawbacks of different tax structures in the quest for a fair and effective solution.