logo

From Pixels to Panic: 'Five Nights at Freddy’s' Film Adaption Falters in Horror Genre - A Movie Review

"A Frightful Misstep: 'Five Nights at Freddy’s' Movie Review"

Just in time for Halloween, the much-anticipated "Five Nights at Freddy’s" movie, an adaptation of the popular video game, arrives with the promise of demented Chuck E. Cheese-like animatronics causing havoc. However, what was anticipated as a treat turns out to be more of a trick on the audience. The film, inspired by Scott Cawthon's video game featuring animatronic creatures with a taste for mayhem, stumbles right from the start, with its primary issues residing in the creatures themselves.

Despite attempts at unsettling aesthetics with bright eyes and teeth, the animatronic characters fall flat. Dressed in bow ties and slogans like "Let’s Eat," they come across as more comical than eerie, resembling overgrown Care Bears with a questionable sense of fashion. Somewhere caught between the realms of PG and R, and straddling the fine line between unintended comedy and horror, the PG-13 rating doesn't save "Five Nights at Freddy’s" from being considered one of the weakest films of the year across genres.

The storyline mirrors the video game, with our protagonist, played by Josh Hutcherson, taking on the role of a night watchman tasked with overseeing the remains of an abandoned children's restaurant haunted by the ghosts of missing kids from the '80s. His motivation is to secure custody of his sister, played by Piper Rubio. While Rubio delivers a commendable performance, the film features seasoned actors like Mary Stuart Masterson and Matthew Lillard, who seem to be grappling with a script that oscillates between unintentional humor and forced horror.

Director Emma Tammi, along with the credited scriptwriters Cawthon and Seth Cuddeback, attempt to inject a backstory into the film, offering reasons for the existence of murderous animatronics. Yet, the plot becomes convoluted, dragging the narrative into a realm that should have earned it a cameo in a horror franchise like "Saw."

As the film hurtles toward its conclusion, the audience is left with more questions than answers. Why the heavy use of "Talking in Your Sleep" by the Romantics? Why does the script neglect a basic understanding of human decay? Why the abrupt shifts in dialogue from flirty to angry within the same scene? And, most perplexing, why is the revelation that the maniacal Care Bears can talk saved for the last 10 minutes?

In the end, "Five Nights at Freddy’s" misses the mark, failing to deliver the anticipated chills and thrills expected from a horror flick, leaving audiences questioning the creative decisions that led to this cinematic misadventure.

"Dreams and Disappointments: 'Five Nights at Freddy’s' Struggles to Haunt Reality"

In an ironic twist, the most captivating moments of "Five Nights at Freddy’s" unfold within the dreamstate, urging viewers to nudge their seatmates awake to re-engage with the show. Perhaps, the inclusion of "Talking in Your Sleep" serves a purpose in reviving the audience. The filmmakers attempt to infuse horror into a kids' ball pit, but the real nadir is reached when the supposedly murderous animatronics—Freddy Fazbear, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy—unexpectedly host a kiddie dance party. It's as if even these characters can't escape their origins from Jim Henson’s Creature Shop.

The film, which should have perhaps remained in the realm of gaming, fails to capitalize on the potential of making a kids' ball pit genuinely frightening. Instead, it descends into the absurdity of animatronic characters throwing a cheery dance bash, diluting any intended sense of horror. "Five Nights at Freddy’s," released by Universal Pictures in theaters and on Peacock, receives a PG-13 rating for "strong violent content, bloody images, and language." With a runtime of 110 minutes, the film struggles to earn a single star out of four.

As the dream sequences provide fleeting moments of excitement, the film overall falls short of expectations, leaving audiences questioning the decision to bring the gaming sensation to the big screen. For those seeking a spine-chilling experience, "Five Nights at Freddy’s" may not live up to its potential, and the lingering feeling is that this cinematic venture might have been better left in the immersive world of video games.

For more information, you can visit the official movie website: Five Nights at Freddy’s.

Mark Kennedy can be followed on Twitter for more insights into the world of entertainment.

In conclusion, "Five Nights at Freddy’s" struggles to bring the thrill of the popular video game to the big screen. The irony lies in the film's most captivating moments occurring within a dreamstate, prompting viewers to nudge their seatmates awake. Despite attempts to inject horror into unexpected places, such as a kids' ball pit, the film takes an unfortunate turn when supposedly murderous animatronics transition into hosting a kiddie dance party, a move that dilutes the intended sense of horror.

The film, released by Universal Pictures and available on Peacock, fails to capitalize on the potential to make the source material genuinely frightening. With a PG-13 rating for "strong violent content, bloody images, and language," and a runtime of 110 minutes, "Five Nights at Freddy’s" earns a disappointing zero stars out of four.

As dreams offer fleeting excitement, the film as a whole falls short of expectations, leaving audiences questioning the decision to adapt the gaming sensation to the cinematic realm. For those seeking a spine-chilling experience, "Five Nights at Freddy’s" may not deliver, raising the lingering sentiment that this venture might have been better left within the immersive world of video games. For additional insights into the entertainment world, follow Mark Kennedy on Twitter.