logo

Behind the Veil: DNC Channels Political Funds to Cover Biden's Legal Costs in Special Counsel Investigation by Robert Hur

In a Twist of Politics: DNC Foots Biden's Legal Bill in Robert Hur Investigation

Recent disclosures reveal a surprising twist in the political arena: the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has been shouldering President Joe Biden's legal expenses linked to special counsel Robert Hur's inquiry into his handling of classified materials. Sources and expenditure filings by the party committee indicate that since last year, over $1 million has been funneled to Bob Bauer's law firm, Biden's lead attorney in Hur's investigation, averaging around $150,000 monthly from July 2023 to February 2024.

The revelation, initially brought to light by Axios, exposes a parallel stream of payments totaling approximately $905,000 to Hemenway & Barnes LLP, the legal representation firm of Jennifer Miller, also involved in Biden's defense against the special counsel probe. However, given the firm's pre-existing ties with the DNC, the allocation of these funds specifically for Biden's legal defense remains ambiguous.

Coinciding with the onset of payments to Bob Bauer PLLC, the DNC notably escalated its monthly disbursements to Hemenway & Barnes LLP, rising from roughly $15,000 to $100,000 since July of the previous year. Throughout this period, both firms consistently ranked among the top recipients of DNC funds, alongside longstanding legal allies Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and Perkins Coie, engaged by the DNC for various legal matters.

Clarifying the funding origins, DNC spokesperson Alex Floyd emphasized that grassroots donors' contributions are not directed towards Biden's legal expenditures, drawing a sharp contrast with former President Donald Trump's approach of soliciting legal fees from supporters. Floyd underscored the DNC's commitment to preserving grassroots contributions solely for party activities, contrasting it with what he portrayed as Trump's personal appropriation of campaign funds.

This financial backing by the Democratic Party for Biden's legal defense surfaces amidst vehement criticisms directed at the Republican Party's fundraising endeavors to cover Donald Trump's extensive legal bills over the years. Rufus Gifford, the Biden campaign's finance chair, reiterated on MSNBC the campaign's dedication to utilizing every donation for voter outreach, positioning it as a stark departure from the perceived misuse of funds in Trump's legal battles.

Transparency in Fundraising: Biden Campaign Denies Allocation to Legal Costs Amid Accusations

We are not spending money on legal bills," asserted Gifford. "We are not hawking gold sneakers, or any of that stuff. The money that we are raising, we are going straight to voters." This declaration preceded a significant fundraiser featuring former Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton. Kevin Munoz, spokesperson for the Biden campaign, underscored the significance of grassroots donor support, juxtaposing it with Republican fundraising struggles and the necessity to finance Trump's legal battles.

Munoz emphasized the origin and destination of funds, stating, "When you look at the money that we are raising, which is overwhelmingly from grassroots donors… this is money going to voters, this is money going to voters in the battleground states. And when you look at what Trump is doing, that money, we don't know where it's going. It might be going to legal fees.

In response, Trump's campaign accused Democrats of hypocrisy regarding their stance on RNC contributions. Karoline Leavitt, national press secretary for the Trump campaign, criticized Biden and the Democrats, alleging their campaign against Trump was built on falsehoods and double standards. Leavitt pointed to revelations that the DNC had disbursed millions to cover Biden's legal expenses, challenging the veracity of the Democrats' claims.

Trump's legal entanglements, both during his presidency and afterward, have incurred substantial costs for his political machinery and the Republican Party. Disclosure reports indicate that Trump's fundraising entities, including Save America, have spent nearly $100 million on legal fees since leaving office, with a significant portion allocated to his numerous legal battles. Despite facing 88 criminal charges and multiple civil and criminal trials, Trump maintains his innocence.

Additionally, during Trump's tenure, the RNC has shouldered significant legal expenses for individuals close to the former president, including Donald Trump Jr., amidst inquiries into alleged Russian interference and impeachment proceedings. Between 2021 and 2022, the RNC reportedly spent close to $2 million on legal fees related to investigations in New York on Trump's behalf, as detailed in disclosure reports.

Shift in Legal Responsibility: RNC Ceases Trump's Legal Coverage Amidst 2024 Candidacy Announcement

Following Trump's declaration of candidacy for the 2024 presidential race in late 2022, the Republican National Committee (RNC) terminated its financial support for his legal expenses, citing a commitment to impartiality during the GOP primary process. Disclosure reports indicate a transfer of legal coverage predominantly to Save America, one of Trump's fundraising entities. Earlier this year, with the Republican Party designating Trump as its presumptive nominee and his team assuming control of the RNC, the party's new leadership emphasized that the committee would no longer subsidize his legal fees.

While the RNC has ceased its direct payments for Trump's legal defense, a portion of its joint fundraising efforts with the Trump campaign now channel funds to the Save America Political Action Committee (PAC). Under this arrangement, up to $5,000 of each donation is directed to Save America before being distributed among the RNC and 40 other state party committees participating in the fundraising initiative.

Lara Trump, Trump's daughter-in-law and recently elected co-chair of the RNC, clarified last month that donors have the option to withhold contributions earmarked for Trump's legal expenses. She affirmed, "Anyone who does not want to contribute to that very small amount of money is able to opt out of that … don't want that specific amount to go to Donald Trump's legal bills, then you are very -- you can very easily opt out of that." Lara Trump underscored the flexibility for donors to allocate their contributions directly to the RNC or to alternative fundraising channels that exclude Save America from the equation.

In conclusion, the evolution of financial support for Donald Trump's legal challenges reflects a complex interplay of political dynamics within the Republican Party. As Trump officially entered the 2024 presidential race, the RNC's decision to cease funding his legal bills aimed to uphold a perception of fairness in the GOP primary process. With legal coverage shifting predominantly to Save America, donors now have the option to allocate their contributions selectively, reflecting a nuanced approach to fundraising within the party. The intricate arrangements underscore the evolving landscape of political financing and the delicate balance between party loyalty and individual ambitions in the American political arena.